Skip to content
CRYPTO & DECENTRALIZED TECH

Galaxy’s Alex Thorn Declares Bitcoin Bottom, Pointing to Moving Average Reclaim and $80K Resilience

By Patrick Green

In a comprehensive new research note that has quickly drawn the attention of institutional investors and market analysts alike, Galaxy’s Head of Research, Alex Thorn, has made a definitive call regarding the current market cycle: the bottom for Bitcoin is officially in. Thorn’s latest analysis breaks down a convergence of technical indicators, macroeconomic pressures, and shifting institutional participation, arguing that the conditions are primed for a sustained recovery, even as prevailing market sentiment remains cautious and subdued.

The core thesis of Galaxy’s research note opens with an unambiguous statement asserting that the market has cleared its cyclical lows. To back up this bold assertion, Thorn points to a compelling historical technical milestone: Bitcoin’s successful reclaim of its 50-week moving average. According to historical data analyzed by Galaxy, whenever Bitcoin has spent an extended period—specifically twenty weeks or more—trading below its 50-week moving average and subsequently managed to reclaim it, the market has never gone on to print a new cyclical low. This technical threshold has historically acted as a robust dividing line between macro bear markets and the resumption of long-term upward momentum, providing a strong foundation for Thorn’s bottom call.

Complementing this technical indicator is Bitcoin’s remarkable price action and psychological resilience around the $80,000 threshold. Despite persistent macro headwinds, shifting regulatory landscapes, and broader market jitters surrounding artificial intelligence and risk assets, Bitcoin has repeatedly found strong defensive buying whenever it approaches or tests the $80,000 level. This price resilience demonstrates that institutional capital and long-term holders are willing to aggressively defend key psychological and technical zones, absorbing selling pressure that might have triggered deeper corrections in previous market cycles.

One of the most intriguing arguments put forward by Thorn in the research note is the current state of market positioning. Contrary to what might be expected during a robust recovery, Thorn highlights that retail and broader market positioning remains remarkably light. In his view, "the crowd is not here," meaning that retail mania, excessive leverage, and unbridled speculative euphoria are largely absent from the current environment. For seasoned market participants, this lack of crowded positioning is viewed as a bullish divergence. Because the general public and speculative retail capital have not yet piled back into the market in full force, being long on Bitcoin at this juncture is paradoxically a contrarian stance, leaving plenty of room for fresh capital to enter as confidence gradually returns.

This structural evolution in the market is further illuminated by recent 13F regulatory filings, which reveal a profound shift in who is actually holding and accumulating Bitcoin. The data shows a distinct rotation away from traditional short-term hedge funds, which have historically driven volatile trading cycles and speculative froth. In their place, sovereign wealth funds, pension funds, and major wealth managers are steadily establishing and expanding their footprints in the digital asset ecosystem. This migration of capital from nimble, risk-seeking trading desks to patient, long-term sovereign and institutional allocators fundamentally changes the supply dynamics of Bitcoin, anchoring the asset class with stickier, less volatile capital bases.

Beyond immediate price action and institutional flows, Thorn’s research also touches upon the broader macroeconomic and technological narratives currently intersecting with the cryptocurrency landscape. Discussions around tokenization hype, the shifting narrative pendulum, and the mechanics of the basis trade highlight the growing sophistication of market structures. However, these developments are increasingly overshadowed by massive macroeconomic trends, particularly regarding fiscal policy and sovereign debt.

Thorn and market observers increasingly view the aggressive global build-out of artificial intelligence infrastructure as a massive debasement machine. The immense capital expenditure, energy consumption, and fiscal stimulus required to drive the AI revolution are inextricably linked to expanding national deficits and currency debasement. As U.S. national debt continues to climb and fiscal dominance takes center stage, the structural argument for Bitcoin as digital gold and an ultimate hedge against sovereign monetary inflation becomes increasingly difficult to ignore. In an environment where traditional fiat currencies face structural debasement driven by relentless technological and governmental spending, scarce assets with programmatic supply caps like Bitcoin are positioned to absorb fleeing capital.

As the financial ecosystem grapples with these overlapping realities, security and operational resilience remain paramount. Discussions extending from these market dynamics naturally touch upon the practicalities of self-custody, hardware wallets, and multisig security setups, especially as the digital realm faces escalating cybersecurity threats alongside the rapid evolution of artificial intelligence. Protecting accumulated wealth becomes just as critical as identifying the macro bottom, ensuring that long-term participants can safely navigate the digital asset landscape as adoption deepens.

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the participants and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of BTC Inc., Bitcoin Magazine, or any affiliated entities. This content is provided for informational and educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment, legal, tax, or accounting advice. Nothing contained herein constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, or offer to buy or sell any securities or financial instruments. Viewers and readers should consult their own advisors before making financial or business decisions.